Home Articles List Article Information
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
GHANIA, A., GHAZALA, N., ABDEL-AZEIM, M., MAZEED, A., RAMDAN, S. (2018). COMPARISON BETWEEN SOME PROPOLIS PHENOLIC COMPONENTS IN EGYPT. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 96(4), 1327-1334. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2018.142624
AYMEN M. GHANIA; NAGLAA E. GHAZALA; MOHAMED A. ABDEL-AZEIM; AHMED R. MAZEED; SAMER H. RAMDAN. "COMPARISON BETWEEN SOME PROPOLIS PHENOLIC COMPONENTS IN EGYPT". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 96, 4, 2018, 1327-1334. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2018.142624
GHANIA, A., GHAZALA, N., ABDEL-AZEIM, M., MAZEED, A., RAMDAN, S. (2018). 'COMPARISON BETWEEN SOME PROPOLIS PHENOLIC COMPONENTS IN EGYPT', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 96(4), pp. 1327-1334. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2018.142624
GHANIA, A., GHAZALA, N., ABDEL-AZEIM, M., MAZEED, A., RAMDAN, S. COMPARISON BETWEEN SOME PROPOLIS PHENOLIC COMPONENTS IN EGYPT. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2018; 96(4): 1327-1334. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2018.142624

COMPARISON BETWEEN SOME PROPOLIS PHENOLIC COMPONENTS IN EGYPT

Article 5, Volume 96, Issue 4, December 2018, Page 1327-1334  XML PDF (592.98 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2018.142624
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
AYMEN M. GHANIA1; NAGLAA E. GHAZALA1; MOHAMED A. ABDEL-AZEIM1; AHMED R. MAZEED1; SAMER H. RAMDAN2
1Dept. of Apiculture, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt1.
2Kingdom of Bee, Fac. of Agric., Ain Shames Univ.
Abstract
propolis samples of different regions in Egypt, added to commercial Chinese propolis were tested to determine their phenolic compounds present in each using HPLC analysis and through Ethanolic and water extract methods. The results obtained revealed presence 12 phenolic compounds in the tested samples on more distributed between them with different concentration and per cent. The ellagic acid recorded the highest percentage in the propolis Kfer- Elsheikh governorate (80%) followed by Qalubiasame collected from Kafer (60%), respectively. While with commercial Chinese it not recorded at all, and considers the very poor phenolic compounds, as well as it characterized by the presence a higher per cent of cinnamic acid. The water propolis extract of old bee wax combs reveals presence a little amount of twelve phenolic compounds, the highest of them was benzoic acid (60%).
Keywords
SOME PROPOLIS; PHENOLIC COMPONENTS
Statistics
Article View: 161
PDF Download: 534