• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
Volume Volume 73 (1995)
Volume Volume 72 (1994)
ALI, S. (2017). STABILITY AND GENETIC DIVERSITY FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 95(4), 1613-1629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2017.151553
SAMIA E. ALI. "STABILITY AND GENETIC DIVERSITY FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 95, 4, 2017, 1613-1629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2017.151553
ALI, S. (2017). 'STABILITY AND GENETIC DIVERSITY FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 95(4), pp. 1613-1629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2017.151553
ALI, S. STABILITY AND GENETIC DIVERSITY FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2017; 95(4): 1613-1629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2017.151553

STABILITY AND GENETIC DIVERSITY FOR YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES

Article 9, Volume 95, Issue 4, December 2017, Page 1613-1629  XML PDF (736.31 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2017.151553
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
SAMIA E. ALI
Cotton Research Institute, ARC, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
the present investigation aimed to determine phenotypic and genotypic stability of some long staple cotton genotypes using stability statistical analysis. Also to identify the range of similarity and diversity between these genotypes. Twenty one genotypes besides three check varieties, (promising cross [(G.89 x Karshenky) x G.86] x G.94 and two check genotypes: G.94 and G.86, were evaluated under six locations i.e.,(Kafr El-Sheikh, El- Dakahleia, El-Monofeia, El-Sharkeia ,El-Gharbeia and El Behera) during 2016 season for yield and its components. The results showed that variances due to genotypes, environments and genotype x environment interaction were highly significant for all studied traits except genotypes for boll weight was significant, which indicated that these genotypes interacted differentially with environments. The heritability values were high for studied traits (over50%) indicating that the phenotypic selection for these strains could be highly effective. The results of phenotypic stability showed that the genotypes No.1 and No. 18 for boll weight, No.9 for seed cotton yield and No.7 for lint cotton yield had phenotypic stability. Average genotypic stability recorded by genotypes No.12,21 and 23the (chick varietyG.94) for all studied traits and surpassed chick varietyG.86 .Nine genotypes No.1,2,5,12,13,18,21,22 the(promising cross [(G.89 x Karsh.) x G.86] x G.94 and 23 exhibited average level of stability also genotypes No.7,8 and 14 observed above average of stability at probability level of 0.95 for boll weight, while twelve genotypes No. 3,7,9,10,12,14,15,19,20,21,23(G.94) and 24(G.86) exhibitedaverage level of stability for seed cotton yield and lint yield most of them surpassed the overall Mean and chick variety G.86.As for similarity , the results showed that the genotype No.12 and 22 revealed the lower distance 3.411 with similarity level 98.91%, while the genotype No.8 and node 22( all the genotypes) showed the highly distance 69.073 with similarity level 77.83%. The cotton breeder could choose the genotypes which have the highest stability, yield and fiber quality to be used as commercial varieties. According to the previous results the cross [(G.89 x Karsh.) x G.86] xG.94 could be good substitutes to G.94 variety. Also genotypesNo.14 F8632/2015 descending from the cross (G.89 xG.86) x[(G.83 x80)x G.89] ,No.18 F10661/2015 descending from the cross G.85 x(G.89x G.86) and No.1 descending from the cross G.94 x [(G.89 x Pima S6) x G.86] could be good substitutes to the variety G.86.Therefore the genotype No.8 F8609/2015 descending from the cross (G.89 x Pima S6) x {[(Bah.105 x G.67) x (G.72 x Del.)] X (G.89 xG.86)} with the high distance could be used as a parent in the breeding programs.
Keywords
Heritability; Gosssypium barbadense; L; Promising lines; cotton yield traits; Stability statistic analysis; G x E interaction; genetic distance
Statistics
Article View: 175
PDF Download: 422
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.