• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
Volume Volume 73 (1995)
Volume Volume 72 (1994)
AMMAR, A. (2012). QUALITATIVE AND BIOASSAY ASSESSMENT OF GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE USING CERTAIN GROUND SPRAYERS AND DIFFERENT APPLICATION RATES IN MANGO ORCHARDS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 90(4), 1433-1444. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2012.163493
ABDEL-MEGED E. AMMAR. "QUALITATIVE AND BIOASSAY ASSESSMENT OF GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE USING CERTAIN GROUND SPRAYERS AND DIFFERENT APPLICATION RATES IN MANGO ORCHARDS". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 90, 4, 2012, 1433-1444. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2012.163493
AMMAR, A. (2012). 'QUALITATIVE AND BIOASSAY ASSESSMENT OF GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE USING CERTAIN GROUND SPRAYERS AND DIFFERENT APPLICATION RATES IN MANGO ORCHARDS', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 90(4), pp. 1433-1444. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2012.163493
AMMAR, A. QUALITATIVE AND BIOASSAY ASSESSMENT OF GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE USING CERTAIN GROUND SPRAYERS AND DIFFERENT APPLICATION RATES IN MANGO ORCHARDS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2012; 90(4): 1433-1444. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2012.163493

QUALITATIVE AND BIOASSAY ASSESSMENT OF GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE USING CERTAIN GROUND SPRAYERS AND DIFFERENT APPLICATION RATES IN MANGO ORCHARDS

Article 4, Volume 90, Issue 4, December 2012, Page 1433-1444  XML PDF (303.98 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2012.163493
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
ABDEL-MEGED E. AMMAR
Spray technology Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
Two field experiments were undertaken in El – Ismaillia regions , Egypt to evaluate the performance of different spraying volumes and rate of glyphosate herbicide on annual and perennial weeds control in mango fields 7 years old orchard during 2009 and 2010 summer seasons . Spraying equipment tested were Cp-3 sprayer fitted with TK1 125 L./Fed. or flat fan 02- F110 nozzles 60 L./Fed., Micron Ulva sprayer 19 L./Fed. and Besho sprayer fitted with fan style spray head 70 L./Fed. with the use of rates doses of glyphosate (Herbazid 48% wsc) i.e. 4.0, 2.5 and 1.25 L./Fed. with TK1 nozzle, 2.5 and 1.25 L./Fed. with both flat fan 02- F110 nozzle, Ulva sprayer and Besho sprayer as compared with hand hoeing and unweeded check. Each experiment was included eleven treatments in a complete randomized block design with four replicates. Data indicated that the using of flat fan 02- F110 nozzel and Micron Ulva sprayer (Herbi) can reduced glyphosate rate dose to 2.5 L./Fed. compared with TK1 nozzle at rate dose 4 L./Fed. without effect on weed control efficacy. The same sprayers were reduced the contamination of applicator to 6.44, 10% in the first season and 9.1, 10.1% in the second season respectively, at the same rate dose of 2.5 L./Fed. the percentage control which obtained by these spraying volumes were 91.3% and 85.8 % in the first season and 94% and 86.9% in the second season respectivily, as compared with TK1 125 L./Fed. spraying volume which gave 94.1% and 96.7% for the first and second seasons respectively at rate dose of 4 L./Fed. of glyphosate. In case of Besho sprayer 70 L./Fed. spraying volume gave satisfactory coverage on weed leaves and excellent control of weeds. The low rate of glyphosate at rate dose 1.25 L./Fed. gave good efficacy in controlling annual weeds which reached 82.3% control for existed weeds and exceeded hand hoeing. Thus it could be concluded that, low volume spraying could reduced glyphosate rate dose without any significant reduction in control efficacy of total weeds and decreasing the amount of contamination of applicator and reduced lost spray on land and other possible risks on the environment.
Statistics
Article View: 147
PDF Download: 469
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.