• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
MOHAMED, M., SARY, G., EL-OKKIAH, A., EL-LAWENDEY, M. (2008). COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCIES OF THE DIFFERENT SELECTION PROCEDURES IN THREE POPULATIONS OF EGYPTIAN COTTONS (Gossypium barbadense L.). Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 86(2), 623-629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2008.205726
MOHAMED K. MOHAMED; GABER A. SARY; AHMED F. H. EL-OKKIAH; MOHAMED M. EL-LAWENDEY. "COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCIES OF THE DIFFERENT SELECTION PROCEDURES IN THREE POPULATIONS OF EGYPTIAN COTTONS (Gossypium barbadense L.)". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 86, 2, 2008, 623-629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2008.205726
MOHAMED, M., SARY, G., EL-OKKIAH, A., EL-LAWENDEY, M. (2008). 'COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCIES OF THE DIFFERENT SELECTION PROCEDURES IN THREE POPULATIONS OF EGYPTIAN COTTONS (Gossypium barbadense L.)', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 86(2), pp. 623-629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2008.205726
MOHAMED, M., SARY, G., EL-OKKIAH, A., EL-LAWENDEY, M. COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCIES OF THE DIFFERENT SELECTION PROCEDURES IN THREE POPULATIONS OF EGYPTIAN COTTONS (Gossypium barbadense L.). Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008; 86(2): 623-629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2008.205726

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCIES OF THE DIFFERENT SELECTION PROCEDURES IN THREE POPULATIONS OF EGYPTIAN COTTONS (Gossypium barbadense L.)

Article 17, Volume 86, Issue 2, July 2008, Page 623-629  XML PDF (1.67 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2008.205726
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
MOHAMED K. MOHAMED1; GABER A. SARY1; AHMED F. H. EL-OKKIAH2; MOHAMED M. EL-LAWENDEY2
1Faculty of Agriculture, Moshtohor, Zagazig University, Egypt
2Cotton Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Different selection methods i e phenotypic individual trait selection, selection index and recurrent selection were used to improve lint yield in three populations of Egyptian cotton, G. 45 x G. 75, G. 87 x G. 89 and G. 86 variety grown in open-pollinated bulks for four years. In population I (G. 45 x G. 75), the direct phenotypic trait selection procedure in F4 generation for lint yield (In.,) was superior to the other selection procedures. Concerning population II (G. 87 x G. 89), the recurrent selection and phenotypic trait selection for bolls/plant (I4) in F4 generation were more efficient than the other selection procedures. Regarding population III (G. 86 open-pollinated cultivar), both recurrent selection and index I, in S2 generation were superior compared with the other selection procedures.
Statistics
Article View: 92
PDF Download: 274
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.