• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
Volume Volume 73 (1995)
Volume Volume 72 (1994)
AMMAR, A. (2007). CONVENTIONAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL SPRAYING TECHNIQUES FOR CONTROLLING WHITEFLY ATTACKING TOMATO PLANTS IN GREENHOUSES.. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 85(1), 67-75. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2007.211061
ABEL-MEGED E. AMMAR. "CONVENTIONAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL SPRAYING TECHNIQUES FOR CONTROLLING WHITEFLY ATTACKING TOMATO PLANTS IN GREENHOUSES.". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 85, 1, 2007, 67-75. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2007.211061
AMMAR, A. (2007). 'CONVENTIONAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL SPRAYING TECHNIQUES FOR CONTROLLING WHITEFLY ATTACKING TOMATO PLANTS IN GREENHOUSES.', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 85(1), pp. 67-75. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2007.211061
AMMAR, A. CONVENTIONAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL SPRAYING TECHNIQUES FOR CONTROLLING WHITEFLY ATTACKING TOMATO PLANTS IN GREENHOUSES.. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2007; 85(1): 67-75. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2007.211061

CONVENTIONAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL SPRAYING TECHNIQUES FOR CONTROLLING WHITEFLY ATTACKING TOMATO PLANTS IN GREENHOUSES.

Article 6, Volume 85, Issue 1, March 2007, Page 67-75  XML PDF (2.05 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2007.211061
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
ABEL-MEGED E. AMMAR
Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Field experiments were undertaken in El - Ismaillia Govemorate, Egypt to evaluate the performance of two ground spraying techniques in greenhouse against whitefly Bemisia tabad (Genn) infesting tomato plants during 2004 & 2005 seasons. Tested spraying equipment were : semco sprayer with hand lance at 6 L/fad. and conventional sprayer at 300 1/fad. with the use of Prempet and jojoba (plant extract) insecticides. Data indicated that semco sprayer with hand lance at 6 L/fad. gave satisfactory coverage on tomato plants amounted 93.75 and 90.7% and minimum lost between plants accounted for 0.59 - 1.48% and very poor contamination on the applicator by 5.66 - 8.14 of spray deposit. But in case of conventional sprayer at 300 L/fad., percentage of spray deposit ranged presented by 42.7 and 34.2% on tomato plants, lost on land between tomato plants was 17.95 and 15.6%, and contamination of applicator reached 47.43 and 41.7%. Data showed that semco sprayer with hand lance at 6 L/fad. gave excellent control against whitefly by using recommended and 3/4 recommended of Prempet insecticide at 300 ljfad. which presented by 80.9 and 67.1%, respectively, followed by jojoba (plant extract) at 500 1/100 litre water with the same sprayer at recommended and 3/4 recommended rates give 68. land 50.3%, respectively. Meanwhile, conventional sprayer gave percent reduction ranged between 59.4 and 56.6 by using Prempet insecticide and 50.1 and 37.4 % with jojoba (plant extract) at recommended and 3/4 recommended respectively.
Statistics
Article View: 98
PDF Download: 287
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.