• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
FARAG, H. (2006). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF. THREE COMPOST AERATION METHODS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 84(4), 1197-1206. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2006.233576
HISHAM A. FARAG. "A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF. THREE COMPOST AERATION METHODS". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 84, 4, 2006, 1197-1206. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2006.233576
FARAG, H. (2006). 'A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF. THREE COMPOST AERATION METHODS', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 84(4), pp. 1197-1206. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2006.233576
FARAG, H. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF. THREE COMPOST AERATION METHODS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006; 84(4): 1197-1206. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2006.233576

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF. THREE COMPOST AERATION METHODS

Article 18, Volume 84, Issue 4, December 2006, Page 1197-1206  XML PDF (2.19 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2006.233576
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
HISHAM A. FARAG
Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the influence of three aeration methods in compost production and quality. The studied treatments were: (natural aeration, manual turning using hand shovels, and mechanical turning using self propelled turning machine) with two agitation rates used once and twice a week. The final properties of the produced compost were different in M.C., C/N, pH, particle size, odor, and time of composting. Generally, the results showed that, using an agitation method (manual or mechanical) afford good quality of compost in a short composting period compared with the natural aeration. The final investigation results indicated that, using mechanical turning may give best properties of compost compared with natural or manual aeration. The heap 4 that was aerated using mechanical turning once a week has optimum properties of compost especially in C/N (23/1) and pH (7.5) beside an average particle size (12mm).
Keywords
Compost; Agitation; Turned; Aeration Methods; Waste recycle
Statistics
Article View: 118
PDF Download: 338
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.