• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
METAWEH, H., GOMAA, E., SHERIF, R., ABDEL-FATAH, T. (2002). EVALUATION OF SOME ALTERNATIVE CARRIERS TO WHEAT BRAN ON THE FOURTH NYMPHAL INSTAR OF EUPREPOCNEMIS PLORANS PLORANS AND liETERACRIS ANNULOSA. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(1), 239-251. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.304082
HAMZA H. METAWEH; ELADROSY A. GOMAA; REFAT M. SHERIF; THARWAT A. ABDEL-FATAH. "EVALUATION OF SOME ALTERNATIVE CARRIERS TO WHEAT BRAN ON THE FOURTH NYMPHAL INSTAR OF EUPREPOCNEMIS PLORANS PLORANS AND liETERACRIS ANNULOSA". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80, 1, 2002, 239-251. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.304082
METAWEH, H., GOMAA, E., SHERIF, R., ABDEL-FATAH, T. (2002). 'EVALUATION OF SOME ALTERNATIVE CARRIERS TO WHEAT BRAN ON THE FOURTH NYMPHAL INSTAR OF EUPREPOCNEMIS PLORANS PLORANS AND liETERACRIS ANNULOSA', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(1), pp. 239-251. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.304082
METAWEH, H., GOMAA, E., SHERIF, R., ABDEL-FATAH, T. EVALUATION OF SOME ALTERNATIVE CARRIERS TO WHEAT BRAN ON THE FOURTH NYMPHAL INSTAR OF EUPREPOCNEMIS PLORANS PLORANS AND liETERACRIS ANNULOSA. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2002; 80(1): 239-251. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.304082

EVALUATION OF SOME ALTERNATIVE CARRIERS TO WHEAT BRAN ON THE FOURTH NYMPHAL INSTAR OF EUPREPOCNEMIS PLORANS PLORANS AND liETERACRIS ANNULOSA

Article 20, Volume 80, Issue 1, March 2002, Page 239-251  XML PDF (3.81 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2002.304082
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
HAMZA H. METAWEH1; ELADROSY A. GOMAA2; REFAT M. SHERIF2; THARWAT A. ABDEL-FATAH1
1Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
2Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazlg University, Egypt
Abstract
Studies were carried out to evaluate some alternative carnets to wheat bran and the preferred carriers in the presence of green food plant. berseem, info:him olorandrinum and maze. Zoo mays on the grasshoppers. Euprepecnernis plo-arts *fans and Heteraais &mutest The carriers used in the study were wheat bran• corn hull, bean hay. groundnut husks. berseem hay, wheal hay. rice husks and saw-dust. No significant differences were observed between the four prefe-rential carriers, i.e. wheal bran, bean hay, corn hull and groundnut husks. The descending order of the consumed amount of the carriers in gm. per gm. b.wl. of E. (*rims : Wheat bran> bean lusy>corn hull> groundnut husks> berseem hap rice husks>wheat hay = saw dust. Concerning H. amebas. carriers could be arranged descending.y as follows : corn hull> wheat bran> bean hap groundnut husks> ber‌seem hap wheat hap rice husks> sawdust. However, the grasshopper. H. aN7140$8. consumed less amounts 01 the carriers than the other ono. The grasshoppers ate the preferential carriers in the presence of the green plant berseem, T.. alexendrinum with non significant differenc‌es in the case of E. picwans. But, with the grasshopper H. annubsa, sig-nificant differences were existed. In the presence of the green food plant maize, similar results were recorded, but higher amounts were consumed front the carrier and the green plant terse/3m than from maize. Concerning H. ameba the contrary existed. since the insects consumed higher amounts of carriers In the presence of maize than in the presence of berseem, except in the case of groundnut husks. the nymphs ate approximately equal amounts.
Statistics
Article View: 45
PDF Download: 211
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.