• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
SALMAN, F., AHAMED, A., MOHAMED, H., GADEL- RAB, M. (2002). EVALUATION OF SOME SOYBEAN VARIETIES TO NATURAL INFESTATION WITH WHITEFLY BEMISIA TABAC1(GENN.) AND SPIDER MITE TETRANYCHUS URTICAE (KOCH.) IN UPPER EGYPT. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(2), 619-629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.306561
FARGHAL A. A. SALMAN; ABEL-WAHED M. M. AHAMED; HAMED A. MOHAMED; MOHAMED L. E. GADEL- RAB. "EVALUATION OF SOME SOYBEAN VARIETIES TO NATURAL INFESTATION WITH WHITEFLY BEMISIA TABAC1(GENN.) AND SPIDER MITE TETRANYCHUS URTICAE (KOCH.) IN UPPER EGYPT". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80, 2, 2002, 619-629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.306561
SALMAN, F., AHAMED, A., MOHAMED, H., GADEL- RAB, M. (2002). 'EVALUATION OF SOME SOYBEAN VARIETIES TO NATURAL INFESTATION WITH WHITEFLY BEMISIA TABAC1(GENN.) AND SPIDER MITE TETRANYCHUS URTICAE (KOCH.) IN UPPER EGYPT', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(2), pp. 619-629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.306561
SALMAN, F., AHAMED, A., MOHAMED, H., GADEL- RAB, M. EVALUATION OF SOME SOYBEAN VARIETIES TO NATURAL INFESTATION WITH WHITEFLY BEMISIA TABAC1(GENN.) AND SPIDER MITE TETRANYCHUS URTICAE (KOCH.) IN UPPER EGYPT. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2002; 80(2): 619-629. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.306561

EVALUATION OF SOME SOYBEAN VARIETIES TO NATURAL INFESTATION WITH WHITEFLY BEMISIA TABAC1(GENN.) AND SPIDER MITE TETRANYCHUS URTICAE (KOCH.) IN UPPER EGYPT

Article 8, Volume 80, Issue 2, July 2002, Page 619-629  XML PDF (2.83 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2002.306561
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
FARGHAL A. A. SALMAN; ABEL-WAHED M. M. AHAMED; HAMED A. MOHAMED; MOHAMED L. E. GADEL- RAB
Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
Six soybean varieties namely, Giza111, Giza35, Giza21, Giza82, Clark and Crawford were tested for infestation with cotton whitefly Be­roisia tabaci (Genn.) and spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Koch.) in Shandweel Research Station, Sohag Governorate during two successive seasons, 1999 and 2000. The seasonal abundance of the whitefly was moderately low during July, then reached its peak during August and the population decreased to the lowest level in September in the two suc­cessive seasons. The same trend was noticed for the spider mite. Statis­tical analysis showed that there were significant differences between the soybean varieties and the infestation with the two pests. Soybean varieties can be arranged for their susceptibility to infes­tation with whiteflies as follows; Giza35 and Crawford as susceptible ones, while 6.111, G.21, G.82 and Clark were tow resistant. In case of the spider mite, however, Giza 21 and Crawford were susceptible, while G.111, G.35, G.82 and Clark were low resistant
Statistics
Article View: 72
PDF Download: 237
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.