• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
Volume Volume 73 (1995)
Volume Volume 72 (1994)
KAMEL, O., EL-KHATEEB, H. (2002). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS OF RICE TRANSPLANTING UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(3), 1317-1335. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312659
OSAMA M. KAMEL; HAMADA A. EL-KHATEEB. "PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS OF RICE TRANSPLANTING UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80, 3, 2002, 1317-1335. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312659
KAMEL, O., EL-KHATEEB, H. (2002). 'PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS OF RICE TRANSPLANTING UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(3), pp. 1317-1335. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312659
KAMEL, O., EL-KHATEEB, H. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS OF RICE TRANSPLANTING UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2002; 80(3): 1317-1335. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312659

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS OF RICE TRANSPLANTING UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS

Article 27, Volume 80, Issue 3, September 2002, Page 1317-1335  XML PDF (5.45 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312659
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
OSAMA M. KAMEL; HAMADA A. EL-KHATEEB
Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Field experiments were carried out at Rice Mechanization Center, Meet EI-Oeeba. Kafer EI-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt to determine field ca­pacity, field efficiency, slip ratio, planting accuracy, transplanter efficien­cy, total yield. energy requirements and transplanting cost using : a) B­row rotary type transplanter (30 cm between rows) and 12-row crank type transplanter (20 cm between rows). They were operated at three different forward speeds using three different distances between hills within the row. The highest value of effective field capacity was 0.91 fed./h for rotary type transplanter at forward speed of about 2.80 km/h. The high­est value of total yield was (3.52 and 3.21 Mg / led) at the same speed for crank type transplanter 12-row and 8-row rotary transplanter, re­spectively. The crank type transplanter 12-row which gave the highest number of hills per square meter (33hills/m2) at forward speed of 2.80 km/h. The lowest values of missing; damaged and floating hills % were obtained at values of (1.8, 1.0 and 2.5%) with crank type transplanter 12-row. The best results of transplanter efficiency were (84.5%) ob­tained with crank type transplanter 12-row at 2.80km/h. The minimum cost was recorded as (40.0 and 67.50 L.E/fed) for crank type trans­olanter 12-row and 8- row rotary transplanter. respectively. when corn-
Statistics
Article View: 86
PDF Download: 258
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.