Home Articles List Article Information
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
ABUEL-AZM, Y. (2000). EFFECT OF CALCIUM SOURCES ON DOUGH PROPERTIES AND CALCIUM BIOAVAILABILITY. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 78(2), 835-841. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2000.322504
YOUSEF Z. ABUEL-AZM. "EFFECT OF CALCIUM SOURCES ON DOUGH PROPERTIES AND CALCIUM BIOAVAILABILITY". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 78, 2, 2000, 835-841. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2000.322504
ABUEL-AZM, Y. (2000). 'EFFECT OF CALCIUM SOURCES ON DOUGH PROPERTIES AND CALCIUM BIOAVAILABILITY', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 78(2), pp. 835-841. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2000.322504
ABUEL-AZM, Y. EFFECT OF CALCIUM SOURCES ON DOUGH PROPERTIES AND CALCIUM BIOAVAILABILITY. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2000; 78(2): 835-841. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2000.322504

EFFECT OF CALCIUM SOURCES ON DOUGH PROPERTIES AND CALCIUM BIOAVAILABILITY

Article 26, Volume 78, Issue 2, July 2000, Page 835-841  XML PDF (1.71 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2000.322504
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
YOUSEF Z. ABUEL-AZM
Food Technology Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
No significant differences were observed in the relative bioavaila­bility (R.B) of calcium among the studied sources of calcium. Organic sources such as calcium and calcium lactate had the highest (R.B)104%, while calcium sulphate gave 102.7% and the supplement gave 102.4% R.B. compared to calcium carbonate (100% absorption). These data suggest that calcium carbonate and calcium sulphate may be considered as a good sources for bread fortificat. Calcium was equally well available from all studied calcium sources , This is based on the results and status of calcium femur content and calcium absorption. Meanwhile, calcium sources had no effect on the rheological properties of studied doughs.
Statistics
Article View: 33
PDF Download: 150