• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
KHALAFALLA, E., SALEM, R., MITRI, S. (1997). SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON VARIETIES TO INFESTATION WITH SUCKING INSECTS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 75(2), 383-391. doi: 10.21608/ejar.1997.404765
EL-SAYED M. E. KHALAFALLA; RAMADAN M. SALEM; SAMIRA H. MITRI. "SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON VARIETIES TO INFESTATION WITH SUCKING INSECTS". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 75, 2, 1997, 383-391. doi: 10.21608/ejar.1997.404765
KHALAFALLA, E., SALEM, R., MITRI, S. (1997). 'SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON VARIETIES TO INFESTATION WITH SUCKING INSECTS', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 75(2), pp. 383-391. doi: 10.21608/ejar.1997.404765
KHALAFALLA, E., SALEM, R., MITRI, S. SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON VARIETIES TO INFESTATION WITH SUCKING INSECTS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1997; 75(2): 383-391. doi: 10.21608/ejar.1997.404765

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON VARIETIES TO INFESTATION WITH SUCKING INSECTS

Article 10, Volume 75, Issue 2, July 1997, Page 383-391  XML PDF (2.13 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.1997.404765
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
EL-SAYED M. E. KHALAFALLA; RAMADAN M. SALEM; SAMIRA H. MITRI
Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Nine Egyptian cotton varieties were evaluated for their suscepti­bility to infestation with certain sucking insects under field conditions of north Delta during 1995 season. Weekly count of total number of in­sects per 25 seedlings or leaves chosen at random, showed that peak aphid populations on the different varieties occurred during the period from the 2nd week of July to the 3rd week of August. The highest num­bers of aphids existed on cotton variety Giza 83, while Giza 70 har­boured the least numbers. On the other hand, cotton variety Giza 83 was the least infested variety with jassids and whiteflies, which showed highest affinity to va­rieties Giza 70 and Giza 85, respectively. In most tested varieties, the total populations of the three suck­ing insects correlated positively with temperature, and relative humidity, while this correlation was negative with wind speed in all tested varie­ties. The combined effect of the three climatic factors was more pro­nounced on the populations on Giza 45 and Giza 80 than on other varie­ties since it was responsible for 86.8 and 80.33% of variability in the populations, respectively. On the other hand, the total populations were less affected by the three climatic factors collectively on Giza 76, Giza 83 and Giza 77, where it was responsible for 28.00, 21.75 and 19.80% of variability in the populations, respectively.
Statistics
Article View: 31
PDF Download: 71
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.