• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
ATTIA, M. (2002). COMPARING THE LOCAL, IMPORTED DL-METHIONINE HYDROXY ANALOGUE - CALCIUM AND DL-METHIONINE FOR EL- SALAM LOCAL LAYING HENS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(2), 865-879. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.311353
MOSTAFA Y. ATTIA. "COMPARING THE LOCAL, IMPORTED DL-METHIONINE HYDROXY ANALOGUE - CALCIUM AND DL-METHIONINE FOR EL- SALAM LOCAL LAYING HENS". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80, 2, 2002, 865-879. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.311353
ATTIA, M. (2002). 'COMPARING THE LOCAL, IMPORTED DL-METHIONINE HYDROXY ANALOGUE - CALCIUM AND DL-METHIONINE FOR EL- SALAM LOCAL LAYING HENS', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(2), pp. 865-879. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.311353
ATTIA, M. COMPARING THE LOCAL, IMPORTED DL-METHIONINE HYDROXY ANALOGUE - CALCIUM AND DL-METHIONINE FOR EL- SALAM LOCAL LAYING HENS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2002; 80(2): 865-879. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.311353

COMPARING THE LOCAL, IMPORTED DL-METHIONINE HYDROXY ANALOGUE - CALCIUM AND DL-METHIONINE FOR EL- SALAM LOCAL LAYING HENS

Article 25, Volume 80, Issue 2, July 2002, Page 865-879  XML PDF (4.74 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2002.311353
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
MOSTAFA Y. ATTIA
Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
The present study was conducted to compare the biological effi-ciency of local and imported DL-Methionine hydroxy analogue — calcium (LMHA), imported DL- Methionine hydroxy analogue — calcium (IMHA) and DL-methionine (DLM) in corn- soya diet for local strain layers as a source of methionine . Two hundred hens (22 weeks old) of developed local strain "EL-Salem" were fed on ten experimental diets for 16 weeks. Each of the three methionine sources DLM, LMHA and IMHA were added to a basal corn-soya diet,deficient in methionine (0.25%), on equimolar basis at levels of 0.04, 0.06 and 0.08 % . At the end of each 4 weeks interval the productive performance and egg quality parameters were measured. Results obtained can be summarized as follows : The best egg production was obtained at 0.33 % total methio‌nine with 0.08% equivalent added from DLM, LMHA or IMHA. There were a significant increase in shell thickness for all methio-nine treatments as compared with the basal diet . DL-methionine was significantly better than LMHA and IMHA on equimolar basis in the egg production parameters . The relative efficiency of LMHA as compared to DLM was 92.42, 98.57, 91.68 and 86.87% in the term of EN, EW,EM and FC, respective‌ly. Whereas, IMHA is 96.44, 99.35, 95.77 and 93.52%, respectively. According to the linear regression model (Y = A+CX), the efficien‌cy of LMHA was found to be 55.36, 56.50, 54.65 and 49.65 % for EN, EW, EM and FC, respectively, while, the efficiency of IMHA (C3/C1) was 79.71, 71.33, 77.37 and 76.24 %, respectively. 
Statistics
Article View: 62
PDF Download: 224
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.