• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
KAMEL, O., EL-KHATEEB, H. (2002). COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF TWO MECHANICAL WHEAT HARVESTING COMBINES WITH TRADITIONAL SYSTEM. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(3), 1297-1312. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312658
OSAMA M. KAMEL; HAMADA A. EL-KHATEEB. "COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF TWO MECHANICAL WHEAT HARVESTING COMBINES WITH TRADITIONAL SYSTEM". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80, 3, 2002, 1297-1312. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312658
KAMEL, O., EL-KHATEEB, H. (2002). 'COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF TWO MECHANICAL WHEAT HARVESTING COMBINES WITH TRADITIONAL SYSTEM', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 80(3), pp. 1297-1312. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312658
KAMEL, O., EL-KHATEEB, H. COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF TWO MECHANICAL WHEAT HARVESTING COMBINES WITH TRADITIONAL SYSTEM. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2002; 80(3): 1297-1312. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312658

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF TWO MECHANICAL WHEAT HARVESTING COMBINES WITH TRADITIONAL SYSTEM

Article 26, Volume 80, Issue 3, September 2002, Page 1297-1312  XML PDF (4.37 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2002.312658
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
OSAMA M. KAMEL; HAMADA A. EL-KHATEEB
Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Field experiments were carried out at the experimental field of Rice Mechanization Center, Meet EI-Deeba, Kafer El-Sheikh Govemorate, Egypt. Two different types of Japanese combines harvesting machines, Yanmar model CA-385, cutting width 1400 mm, crawler travelling unit. adjusted pick tines and star wheels. Multi-purpose combine harvester Yanmar model CA-760, cutting width 2060 mm, crawler travelling unit, front reel, were tested at three different forward speeds of about (2.3, 3.2 and 4.5 km/h) three cylinder speeds (22.7, 28.1 and 32.1 m/s) and three moisture contents (16.3,13.6 and 10.9%) for wheat crop. The lowest values of header losses, threshing losses and shoe losses were (0.27,0.37 and 0.20%) and (0.35,0.27 and 0.17%) record­ed at grain moisture content of 13.6 %, cylinder speed of 28.1 m/s and forward speed of 2.3 km/h, for combines CA-760 and CA-385 respec­tively. Also the minimum values of total losses were (0.84 and 0.79 %) respectively obtained at forward speed of 2.3 km/h, cylinder speed of 28.1 m/s and grain moisture content of 13.6%, which are recommended for optimum harvesting wheat. At these conditions the criterion cost (109.3 and 94.3 LE/Fed), for the combines CA-760 and CA-385, re­spectively compared with manual harvesting followed by mechanical threshing and winnowing (192.55 L.EIFed).
Statistics
Article View: 52
PDF Download: 210
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.