• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 103 (2025)
Volume Volume 102 (2024)
Volume Volume 101 (2023)
Volume Volume 100 (2022)
Volume Volume 99 (2021)
Volume Volume 98 (2020)
Volume Volume 97 (2019)
Volume Volume 96 (2018)
Volume Volume 95 (2017)
Volume Volume 94 (2016)
Volume Volume 93 (2015)
Volume Volume 92 (2014)
Volume Volume 91 (2013)
Volume Volume 90 (2012)
Volume Volume 89 (2011)
Volume Volume 88 (2010)
Volume Volume 87 (2009)
Volume Volume 86 (2008)
Volume Volume 85 (2007)
Volume Volume 84 (2006)
Volume Volume 83 (2005)
Volume Volume 82 (2004)
Volume Volume 81 (2003)
Volume Volume 80 (2002)
Volume Volume 79 (2001)
Volume Volume 78 (2000)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 77 (1999)
Volume Volume 76 (1998)
Volume Volume 75 (1997)
Volume Volume 74 (1996)
FAYED, M., EL-GEDDAWY, I., EL-ZENY, M. (2000). EFFECT OF SUGAR BEET INTERFERENCE ON SOME GROWTH TRAITS OF THE COMMON ASSOCIATED WEEDS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 78(1), 215-225. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2000.321536
MOHAMED T. B. FAYED; IBRAHIM H. EL-GEDDAWY; MAHA M. EL-ZENY. "EFFECT OF SUGAR BEET INTERFERENCE ON SOME GROWTH TRAITS OF THE COMMON ASSOCIATED WEEDS". Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 78, 1, 2000, 215-225. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2000.321536
FAYED, M., EL-GEDDAWY, I., EL-ZENY, M. (2000). 'EFFECT OF SUGAR BEET INTERFERENCE ON SOME GROWTH TRAITS OF THE COMMON ASSOCIATED WEEDS', Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 78(1), pp. 215-225. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2000.321536
FAYED, M., EL-GEDDAWY, I., EL-ZENY, M. EFFECT OF SUGAR BEET INTERFERENCE ON SOME GROWTH TRAITS OF THE COMMON ASSOCIATED WEEDS. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2000; 78(1): 215-225. doi: 10.21608/ejar.2000.321536

EFFECT OF SUGAR BEET INTERFERENCE ON SOME GROWTH TRAITS OF THE COMMON ASSOCIATED WEEDS

Article 17, Volume 78, Issue 1, March 2000, Page 215-225  XML PDF (2.7 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2000.321536
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
MOHAMED T. B. FAYED1; IBRAHIM H. EL-GEDDAWY2; MAHA M. EL-ZENY2
1Agronomy Department Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
2Sugar Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Two pot trials were conducted in Sugar Crops Research Institute, Giza Research Station, ARC, Egypt in the two successive seasons of 1992/93 and 1993/94. The purpose of this work was to assess the ef‌fect of sugar beet interference (1 sugar beef: 5 weed plants ratio) on growth characteristics of above and sub-soil parts some common asso‌dated weed species. Sugar beet exerted a noticeable reductions in height, number of branches and leaves ,fresh and dry weights of foliage and underground parts/plant of existing weed species after 105, 135 and 180 days from sowing. The extent of reductions was mainly depenent on the neighbour-ing weed species. Shoot growth reduction was more striking with bindweed (Convowulus arvensis, L.), followed by wild beet (Beta vulgaris, L.). Sugar beet interference decreased the number of branches and leaves and fresh and dry weights of aerial parts of bindweed plant than the control after 135 days from sowing by 61.4, 63.2, 78.3 and 74.7% respective‌ly. Contrarily, canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz) can withstand competi‌tion of sugar beet without any significant reductions in its shoot growth. Other weed species: dock weed (Rumex dentatus L.); lambsquarters (Chenopodium murale L.); tooth pick (Ammi majus L.) and bermuda-grass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.) were in-between. Hazardous impact of beet interference on underground parts of weeds was more pronounced with dock weed followed by wild beet and lambsquarters, whereas tooth pick was the only non affected weed by sub-soil competition. 
Statistics
Article View: 55
PDF Download: 206
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.